In a world where economic inequality has reached levels unseen since the Gilded Age, it's tempting to view figures like Donald Trump, Javier Milei, or the leaders of Europe's far-right movements as isolated phenomena—political anomalies born of unique national circumstances. Yet these figures are not anomalies but symptoms of a deeper systemic crisis, one that has been decades in the making. Behind their inflammatory rhetoric and populist posturing lies a sophisticated global power structure that consistently prioritizes neoliberal economics and military expansion over public welfare, democracy, and human flourishing.
The Architecture of Power: Neoliberalism's Global Con
Neoliberalism, marketed for decades as the path to universal prosperity and freedom, has revealed itself as modern history's most elaborate economic deception. Rather than creating broad-based wealth and opportunity, it systematically dismantles social protections, weakens labor rights, and funnels resources upward with breathtaking efficiency. This is not a bug but a feature—a framework meticulously designed and implemented to benefit an oligarchic elite while maintaining just enough stability to prevent outright revolt.
In the United States, the mechanisms of this wealth transfer are particularly visible. The wealthiest individuals don't just passively accumulate wealth—they actively shape policy through a vast network of think tanks, lobbying firms, and political action committees. Figures like Vivek Ramaswamy epitomize this system's contradictions, critiquing aspects of American culture while advocating policies that would make quality education, healthcare, and economic opportunity accessible only to the elite. His rhetoric of "merit" and "innovation" masks a deeper agenda of preserving and extending oligarchic control.
Across Europe, the same patterns emerge in different guises. Austerity measures, implemented under the guise of fiscal responsibility, have systematically gutted public services. From Greece to Britain, governments have slashed social spending while preserving or expanding tax benefits for corporations and the wealthy. The European Union's fiscal rules, particularly the Stability and Growth Pact, have institutionalized this approach, forcing member states to prioritize deficit reduction over social welfare, even during economic crises.
Militarization: The Economic Engine of Inequality
The Baltic Sea region serves as a perfect microcosm of how military expansion and economic interests intertwine in today's global order. In direct contradiction to the assurances given to Gorbachev after the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO's relentless eastward expansion has transformed this once-peaceful region into a geopolitical flashpoint. While politicians trumpet concerns about national security and Russian aggression, what often goes unspoken is the role of the defense industry—a sector whose profits depend on maintaining and escalating these tensions.
This militarization represents far more than a regional phenomenon; it exemplifies a global misallocation of resources on a staggering scale. Instead of funding sustainable development, education, or healthcare, governments channel billions into weapons systems and military bases. The recent inflation of military budgets across NATO countries, ostensibly in response to security threats, represents a massive transfer of public wealth to private defense contractors.
As Charlie Skelton recently observed, even traditionally secretive organizations like the Bilderberg Group are adapting to this new reality, where militaristic and neoliberal interests align more openly than ever before. The "fog of war" serves a dual purpose—it obscures not only battlefield conditions but also the systematic redirection of public funds away from vital social needs. Young adults from economically disadvantaged areas become what cynics call "cannon fodder" while their peers struggle with mounting precarity at home.
The enormous sums poured into military infrastructure represent a global misallocation of resources that goes beyond mere waste. These investments actively shape our society's priorities, creating a self-perpetuating cycle where military solutions become the default response to complex global challenges. The opportunity costs are immense—funds that could revolutionize renewable energy infrastructure, eliminate poverty, or advance medical research instead flow into systems of destruction.
The Far Right: Neoliberalism's Willing Executioners
Far-right movements—from MAGA to Argentina's Milei and Germany's AfD—don't oppose neoliberalism as they often claim; they serve as its most effective enforcers. By positioning themselves as anti-establishment forces, these movements masterfully redirect public anger away from systemic issues and into cultural grievances, ensuring that the fundamental structures of economic power remain untouched.
Elon Musk's recent intervention in German politics, where he voiced support for the AfD, perfectly exemplifies this dynamic. While framed as a populist intervention against establishment politics, Musk's action reveals how billionaires operate within the global oligarchy, using far-right movements to weaken democratic institutions and advance privatization agendas. His significant investments in Germany, combined with his political interventions, demonstrate how capital uses far-right politics to create favorable conditions for its expansion.
Even as democratic institutions increasingly serve elite interests, their erosion under far-right influence threatens to eliminate even the possibility of democratic reform. The far right's attack on these institutions, while claiming to represent popular will, actually advances an agenda that would make meaningful popular participation in governance impossible.
The Divided Majority: How Elites Maintain Control
The contrast could not be more stark: while elites operate as a unified class, consciously advancing their collective interests, the working class remains tragically fragmented. Cultural divisions—amplified by corporate media and opportunistic politicians—prevent the formation of effective collective action. Instead of recognizing their shared economic interests, workers are drawn into exhausting battles over identity and ideology while the underlying economic system continues to extract wealth from their communities.
The "economic draft"—where limited opportunities and crushing student debt push young people into military service—exemplifies how this system perpetuates itself. Those who seek education or economic advancement often find themselves choosing between debt bondage and military service, a choice that is no choice at all.
The 1980s Savings and Loan crisis in the United States offers a stark historical parallel that illuminates present dynamics. That scandal, typically framed as the result of a few bad actors, was, in fact, a systematic looting of the middle class overseen by the government itself. Today's crises—from the housing affordability crisis to mounting student debt—follow the same pattern: systematic wealth extraction from the majority, facilitated by government policy, for the benefit of a small elite.
Charting an Alternative Path
The confluence of neoliberalism and militarization isn't inevitable—it represents specific choices made by power brokers, supported by an extensive infrastructure of think tanks, media outlets, and political operatives. The challenge we face lies not just in imagining an alternative but in building the required political power to implement it.
This alternative would require fundamental transformations:
- Redirecting resources from military expansion to public services and sustainable development
- Investing in education, healthcare, and sustainable industries that serve human needs rather than profit margins
- Building new democratic institutions capable of resisting capture by oligarchic interests
- Recognizing that the fundamental divide in our world exists not between nations or cultures but between a global oligarchy and the majority of humanity (or the capitalist and working class)
- Developing new forms of international cooperation that prioritize human welfare over military confrontation
Neither Trump-style right-wing populism nor centrist neoliberalism offers real solutions to our predicament. The former channels legitimate grievances into destructive nationalism, while the latter pretends that minor technical adjustments can solve systemic problems. Addressing our crisis requires looking beyond these false choices to confront root causes: a global power structure that consistently prioritizes profit over human wellbeing and military dominance over peaceful cooperation.
If you value this kind of deep analytical dive into geopolitics and their implications for our collective future, consider subscribing to my newsletter for more insightful content. Together, we can work to understand—and ultimately transform—the systems that shape our world.
I think you have it right. But, like the damaged airplane flying toward Aktau, the pilot was unable to steer the plane forward in a straight line. Instead, the plane flew a zig-zag line. Going left for a while, then tilting back to the right. It wasted time and energy. But similar to convoys taking zig-zag patterns, it was simply the only way forward. The same can be said about the human society. Even when we see the goals clearly, we can rarely steer the society straight line ahead toward the goal. Either we become authoritarian and drag the society after us and be roasted in the history book, or we get detached from the larger picture and try to get personal comfort and peace. After all, life is too short. Or we try to do what was necessary in a zig-zag. Sometimes we go left, then followed by going right.
In a sense, the right is not always right, while the left has never left. The left are usually truly evil bastards, while the right are usually hypocrites camouflaged as gentlemen. It is an endless struggle. The best we can hope for, is generation by generation, we can move ahead a little bit. Then every couple of hundreds of years, we fall back in a giant step. I am afraid we are on the brink of some large changes which would not let most people feel good. Yet the changes would be necessary. No, I don't mean the neocon, the militarization of the society, or the small minority controlling the minds of many are good things or inevitable. But rather the fight to get rid of these bad actors and factors will always be expensive, and will always take sacrifices and generate casualties.