No doubt, the hegemony of transnational corporations with their non-renewable interests is Hydra. Arguably WW3 is already occurring, as Earth’s oligarchs hide behind Nations to protect the Plutocracy of Empire and its deregulated markets. I say this as an even more radical solidarity of the people is required than a multipolar reality to defeat its finance and profiteering from colonial wars and terror campaigns. Their Dialectic Principle must be the basis of an ethically sustainable morality. For that it they must advocate a Federation of Sovereign Republics, free from the oligarchs transnational corporate sovereignty.
Consider a proposal for its people’s claim to manage Earth’s capital as an Article of the Federation: Proportional Representation is the basis on which the democratic rights of diverse interests are absolute. Note: the Ideological Representation of corporations capital interests contradicts the Republics Sovereignty of ‘We the people…’ #DialecticPrinciple #ArticleOfTheFederation
I fully agree that sovereignty and multipolarity, while necessary as a foundation for nations to survive and thrive, it's true there needs to be solidarity. To prevail in today’s profoundly fractured world, nations must pair sovereignty with a guiding ideological underpinning—one that challenges the hegemony of transnational corporate power and prioritizes the common good, both for humanity and the planet.
First I would like to thank you for dragging my eyes away from Ukraine and WW3. If WW3 happened, nothing much would matter. But since there is a good chance that WW3 does not occur this time, there are more than enough problems around the globe to be concerned about.
I had the impression the alternative media reported her as another WEF minion. I have no clue then or now. So far I have not seen anything obviously changed in Mexico, but I do agree that multiple winds are aligned for Mexico. US reshoring would benefit Mexico a lot. China has to court Mexico. Although far from perfect, Mexico is still a front-runner in many aspects when compared to many countries in Central and South America. The path forward is, however, very difficult, for two reasons: population surplus and drug cartel problems. Mexico needs a total wake-up so ordinary folks are willing to sacrifice themselves to fight against drug cartels as if drug cartels were foreign invaders. I don't see that happening any time soon, though.
I am impressed about the speech you cited, let's hope that Mexico can have some policies actually benefit the general public. However, I confess that I am not optimistic.
The Founding father of Republic of China, Dr. Sun Yat-Sen, formulated his political ideas into three aspects, nationalism, power-to-the-people, and satisfying the needs of consumer consumption. I will talk about only the last term. The average Chinese around 1920 were poor, especially in areas away from the coasts. No wealth to talk about, and most basic life necessities in the 19th century Europe was still beyond the scope of ordinary Chinese family. Dr. Sun did not believe capitalism or communism could achieve the goal of satisfying the basic needs of consumers. This was part of his reasons to have government-run basic industries and civilian co-ops of every kind everywhere. Of course, his ideas were not accepted by Chinese intellectuals at the time. I would like to also cite social policy ideas from Confucius. Confucius did not believe in God or anything supernatural. Government, wealth, theories, and ideologies were all secondary. The most important concept, and Confucius claimed this had been central to Chinese political thinking before him, is that politics and policies should focus on people, and give ordinary people a better life. If I may paraphrase, humans are neither simply labor and consumers as capitalists and economists would say, nor materials used for revolution and the inevitables in history. Humans are not simply voters as politicians see them, and humans are not just large mammals with two legs and can talk. If the elites in society cannot see people as fellow humans, all the grandiose theories, inescapable ideologies, unstoppable forces, or immovable obstacles will eventually all become irrelevant. All social science theories, studies, practices, and policies have to be centered on people, people's lives, and the improvement of such.
countries are positioning themselves for a one world government. Whatever it looks like on the surface, believe me there's something underneath brewing. I'm not for a one world government For too many reasons for me to list here.
No doubt, the hegemony of transnational corporations with their non-renewable interests is Hydra. Arguably WW3 is already occurring, as Earth’s oligarchs hide behind Nations to protect the Plutocracy of Empire and its deregulated markets. I say this as an even more radical solidarity of the people is required than a multipolar reality to defeat its finance and profiteering from colonial wars and terror campaigns. Their Dialectic Principle must be the basis of an ethically sustainable morality. For that it they must advocate a Federation of Sovereign Republics, free from the oligarchs transnational corporate sovereignty.
Consider a proposal for its people’s claim to manage Earth’s capital as an Article of the Federation: Proportional Representation is the basis on which the democratic rights of diverse interests are absolute. Note: the Ideological Representation of corporations capital interests contradicts the Republics Sovereignty of ‘We the people…’ #DialecticPrinciple #ArticleOfTheFederation
I fully agree that sovereignty and multipolarity, while necessary as a foundation for nations to survive and thrive, it's true there needs to be solidarity. To prevail in today’s profoundly fractured world, nations must pair sovereignty with a guiding ideological underpinning—one that challenges the hegemony of transnational corporate power and prioritizes the common good, both for humanity and the planet.
First I would like to thank you for dragging my eyes away from Ukraine and WW3. If WW3 happened, nothing much would matter. But since there is a good chance that WW3 does not occur this time, there are more than enough problems around the globe to be concerned about.
I had the impression the alternative media reported her as another WEF minion. I have no clue then or now. So far I have not seen anything obviously changed in Mexico, but I do agree that multiple winds are aligned for Mexico. US reshoring would benefit Mexico a lot. China has to court Mexico. Although far from perfect, Mexico is still a front-runner in many aspects when compared to many countries in Central and South America. The path forward is, however, very difficult, for two reasons: population surplus and drug cartel problems. Mexico needs a total wake-up so ordinary folks are willing to sacrifice themselves to fight against drug cartels as if drug cartels were foreign invaders. I don't see that happening any time soon, though.
I am impressed about the speech you cited, let's hope that Mexico can have some policies actually benefit the general public. However, I confess that I am not optimistic.
The Founding father of Republic of China, Dr. Sun Yat-Sen, formulated his political ideas into three aspects, nationalism, power-to-the-people, and satisfying the needs of consumer consumption. I will talk about only the last term. The average Chinese around 1920 were poor, especially in areas away from the coasts. No wealth to talk about, and most basic life necessities in the 19th century Europe was still beyond the scope of ordinary Chinese family. Dr. Sun did not believe capitalism or communism could achieve the goal of satisfying the basic needs of consumers. This was part of his reasons to have government-run basic industries and civilian co-ops of every kind everywhere. Of course, his ideas were not accepted by Chinese intellectuals at the time. I would like to also cite social policy ideas from Confucius. Confucius did not believe in God or anything supernatural. Government, wealth, theories, and ideologies were all secondary. The most important concept, and Confucius claimed this had been central to Chinese political thinking before him, is that politics and policies should focus on people, and give ordinary people a better life. If I may paraphrase, humans are neither simply labor and consumers as capitalists and economists would say, nor materials used for revolution and the inevitables in history. Humans are not simply voters as politicians see them, and humans are not just large mammals with two legs and can talk. If the elites in society cannot see people as fellow humans, all the grandiose theories, inescapable ideologies, unstoppable forces, or immovable obstacles will eventually all become irrelevant. All social science theories, studies, practices, and policies have to be centered on people, people's lives, and the improvement of such.
countries are positioning themselves for a one world government. Whatever it looks like on the surface, believe me there's something underneath brewing. I'm not for a one world government For too many reasons for me to list here.